Judge rules that Federman does not pose a threat to public safety
The State petitioned the Court to prohibit Noam Federman, on trial for alledgedly attacking a policeman when he evicted him and his family from their home before destroying it, from entering Yehuda or Shomron during his trial.
Judge Shulamit Dotan, however, ruled that Federman does not pose a threat to public safety, as the police claimed, and therefore they did not have an acceptable reason for keeping him out of Yehuda or Shomron.
Dotan wrote that the nature of the crimes he allegedly committed according to the indictment were "on the lower end of the scale," since he had not taken the initiative and his purpose had not been to disturb the peace.
"The defendant's actions came only after he learned that the police intended to evict him and his family from their home, without delay, and to carry out that same night the demolition orders against his house and other buildings that were in his possession," she wrote. "Surely, this would be a difficult situation for anyone."
Dotan also pointed out that after Federman was initially released from jail in the evening of the day he was arrested, he remained without restrictions for 11 days until the state filed the indictment against him and, at the same time, asked the court to issue the order barring him from Yehuda and Shomron.
"Thus," Dotan continued, "it is hard to accept the claim regarding the danger posed by the suspect to the safety of any individual or the safety of the public. It is even more difficult to accept the claim that he poses a threat when he is free to move around Judea and Samaria and I did not see any justification in the state's artificial distinction between [the danger he poses] in Judea and Samaria and in Israel."
Nevertheless, Dotan said she believed she had seen enough evidence to "establish a reasonable possibility" of proving the charges against Federman in the trial itself.
this report prepared with excerpts from jpost.com
